Optimising feedback for growth in psychosocial skills

Nicolas Bressoud

University of Teacher Education Valais, St-Maurice

chEERS Lab, University of Fribourg, Fribourg

Philippe Gay

University of Teacher Education Vaud, Lausanne

Elena Lucciarini

University of East London, East London

University of Teacher Education Valais, St-Maurice

Optimising feedback for growth in psychosocial skills

Introduction

Context

Need for tools to give effective feedback and develop teachers’ and students’ transversal skills

Objectives

  • Development of a tool to stimulate students’ transversal and academic skills
  • Teachers for students with special needs’ evaluated The Feedback Ruler

The Feedback Ruler

Overview

  • Evidence based tool: research on feedback and self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2012).
  • Created in collaboration with educators / teachers / future teachers / teacher trainers

Objective: finding what type of feedback enhances both academic skills and wellbeing

  • Feedback + academic skills: Analysis of 64 articles, including 7 meta-analyses
  • Feedback + well-being: Analysis of 12 studies

For further details, see Lucciarini (2020)

  • A lot of literature
  • A lot of different perspectives on how to define and apply feedback

Focusing on areas of agreement across different perspectives “Consensus Elements”

Presentation

Feedback in 6 steps

Based on the synthesis by Lucciarini et al. (2022)

  1. Ensure proper timing
  2. Discuss strengths
  3. Highlight progress
  4. Identify areas for improvement
  5. Establish an action plan
  6. Ask for the recipient’s feelings

Comparison with Key Transversal Skills

The feedback ruler is designed to enhance various transversal skills for both Students (S) and Teachers (T).

Self-awareness

  • Understanding own strengths, progress, and challenges

Collaboration and communication

  • Facilitating teacher-student and peer-to-peer interactions
  • Promoting guided feedback for effective communication

Collaboration

Self-awareness:

  • Judging the quality and relevance of one’s actions (S)
  • Exploiting one’s strengths and overcome limitations (S)ses forces et surmonter ses limites (E)

Communication

Language codification:

  • Choosing and adapting relevant language(s) considering intention, context, and recipients (S and T)

Learning Strategies

Task management:

  • Analysing the situation (T)
  • Setting an objective and means to achieve it (S)
  • Anticipating the approach (T)
  • Learning from mistakes (S)
  • Reviewing steps taken (T)

Acquisition of work methods:

  • Distinguishing between what is known and what remains to be discovered (T)
  • Identifying elements of success (S and T)
  • Developing autonomy (S)

Choice and relevance of method:

  • Choosing the appropriate method from available options (S and T)
  • Analysing completed work by reformulating steps and strategies implemented (T)
  • Practicing self-evaluation (S)

Creative Thinking

Awarness of own’s emotional aspect:

  • Identifying and expressing emotions (S and T), (step 6)

Reflective Approach:

Perspective taking:

  • Distanceing oneself, decentering from one’s own actions (S)
  • Comparing different possible or existing opinions and viewpoints (S)

Tool Evaluation

Sample

59 (out of 67) special education teachers

27-60 years old (M = 41.61, Mdn = 42.00)

Population sensitive to transversal skills

Frequent individual interactions

Exploratory Method

Online questionnaire with closed-ended questions

  • I think this feedback tool can be interesting for my practice (yes / no)
  • I think if I had this tool (or model) I would use it for my professional practice. (0: never, 100: often)
  • I find the example phrases relevant to my practice (do you agree to… how do you plan to proceed… etc.) (0: not at all, 100: totally)

Exploratory Method

Grouping into 8 criteria via 16 items

Global Interest in the Tool


Practical Aspect


Theoretical Model


Applicability in Class/Office


Guidance through Examples


Feedback Optimisation


Relationship with Students/Colleagues


Training

Results and Discussion

Main Results

  • 100% of teachers working with SEND students think the tool can be interesting for their practice (better than other professionals)
  • Design perceived as effective in guiding use
  • Theoretical grounding: least important criterion

Results and Discussion

Ranking

Interest index (score from 0 to 5 according to ranking)
Theoretical model Relationship with students/colleagues Feedback optimization Guidance by examples Applicability in class/office Practical aspect
106 122 135 144 151 227

Results by Theme

Global Interest in the Tool

Results by Theme

Global Interest in the Tool

Results by Theme

Practical Aspect

Results by Theme

Theoretical Model

Results by Theme

Applicability in Class/Office

Results by Theme

Guidance through Examples

Results by Theme

Guidance through Examples

Results by Theme

Feedback Optimization

Results by Theme

Relationship with Students/Colleagues

Results by Theme

Training

Discussion

  • Audience particularly demanding and liking practical tools
  • Feeling of usefulness VS effectiveness
  • Perception of the theoretical grounding
  • Training

Conclusion

Summary

  • The Feedback Rule is well-perceived
  • Potential to work on transversal skills through the tool (guidance in relationship and communication, self-awareness)
  • Particularly for the population of SEND students

Limitations

  • Motivation of surveyed individuals (bias)
  • Exploration on tool feasibility only (not effectiveness)

Perspectives

  • Study the tool’s impact on different categories of transversal skills
  • Implement and evaluate the tool on a larger scale
  • The tool depends on the user (training)

Main References

Conférence Intercantonale de l’Instruction Publique de la Suisse Romande et du Tessin. (2024). Plan d’études Romand Scolarité Obligatoire (PER). CIIP. https://www.ciip.ch/Plans-detudes-romands/Plan-detudes-romand-scolarite-obligatoire-PER/Plan-detudes-romand-PER
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-Determination Theory. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins, Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 1 (p. 416‑437). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21
Durlak, J. A., Mahoney, J. L., & Boyle, A. E. (2022). What We Know, and What We Need to Find out about Universal, School-Based Social and Emotional Learning Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Review of Meta-Analyses and Directions for Future Research. Psychological Bulletin, 148(11-12), 765‑782. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000383
Lucciarini, E. (2020). Feedback, Positive Psychology and Education: A Literature Review. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Anglia Ruskin University.
Lucciarini, E., Bressoud, N., & Gay, P. (2022, novembre 11). Using Feedback to Enhance Both Academic Skills and Explicit Wellbeing Skills in Schools: Presentation of a Novel Evidence-Based Tool. [Open paper presentation]. 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational AssessmentEurope, Dublin.
Luis, É., & Lamboy, B. (2015). Les Compétences Psychosociales : Définition et État Des Connaissances. La santé en action, 431.
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087